Outchurched

Consummation

The High Priestly Prayer

There is a moment, the night before a man dies, when everything he truly believes comes to the surface. The performance is over. The crowd is gone. Whatever he says now is not for effect. It is for keeps.

Jesus spent that night in prayer.

He prayed for eleven men who were about to scatter. He prayed for everyone who would ever believe because of what those eleven would say. He prayed for the glory he had before the world was made, and he asked for it back. Not to keep, but to give away.

The prayer of John 17 is the most completely recorded prayer in the Gospels. Matthew Henry, writing in the seventeenth century, noted that many of Christ’s prayers are mentioned but not recorded (that he prayed through the night, that he prayed in Gethsemane, that he prayed from the cross), but that “this prayer… is the most remarkable.” We are given access to it because the disciples were present, and John wrote down what he heard.

What John heard was the Son speaking to the Father about them. Not in their presence as theater, but in their presence as pastoral care. They were being permitted to overhear the conversation that holds them. John Chrysostom, preaching through John’s Gospel in the fourth century, paused at this and named what was happening: He prayed thus in public, that they might learn how great was His care for them, and that they might receive some consolation in their distress. The prayer was a lesson in pastoral love. He was not making petition for Himself (He had no need) but was teaching them that they were encompassed by His intercession, that the Father and He were one in will toward them. (John Chrysostom, Homily LXXXI on John, NPNF1 vol. 14.) Jesus was showing his people, on the last night before everything changed, the interior of their own salvation: the prayer that preceded the sacrifice, spoken aloud so that the people being prayed for could hear it.

There is an intimacy in that which even the farewell discourse (the three long chapters of instruction and comfort that precede it) does not quite match. Teaching is one thing. Intercession is another. In the discourse, Jesus speaks to them. In the prayer, he speaks about them, to the Father, in their hearing. The disciples are not the audience of John 17; they are the subject of it. That is not a small distinction.

The prayer has several movements: a definition of eternal life, a petition for protection rather than removal, a sanctification, and a gift. Any of those could structure a chapter. But the center, the thing all the other movements are organized around, is the gift in verse 22. The glory is given. Everything else serves that claim.

What Kind of Prayer This Is

Before entering the prayer itself, the genre matters. John 17 sits in a specific location in the Gospel with a specific function. Chapters 13 through 16 are the farewell discourse: three long chapters of final instruction, warning, comfort, and promise. Then, before Gethsemane and the arrest, Jesus lifts his eyes to heaven and prays.

He is doing something particular. The old covenant had a high priest who, once a year on the Day of Atonement, entered the Holy of Holies, not without blood, Hebrews tells us, which he offered “for himself, and for the errors of the people” (Hebrews 9:7). The high priest did not enter the inner sanctuary as a casual visitor. He entered as the representative of the people, bearing their names on his vestments, carrying their guilt on the sacrificial animal, and petitioning God for their atonement.

What Jesus is doing in John 17 is that, in its new covenant form. He is the High Priest. He is about to make the sacrifice. Before he does, he specifies (to the Father, in the disciples’ hearing) exactly what his death is meant to accomplish. Matthew Henry reaches here for the legal metaphor of a conveyancing instrument: a deed specifying who would benefit and in what way from a transaction about to be executed. (In English common-law terminology, when property was transferred under a legal process called a “fine,” a separate deed was drawn up to specify the uses to which the transaction would be put: a deed leading the uses of a fine. Henry’s commentary on John 17 uses this kind of legal idiom habitually; the phrasing captures Henry’s sense even where the exact wording is paraphrastic.) The prayer functions as that document. Jesus is the attorney drafting it, and the grantor executing it, and the sacrifice funding it. The prayer is not sentimental. It is covenantal. Every word is load-bearing.

Henry also noted the timing: “a prayer after sacrament; after Christ and his disciples had eaten the passover and the Lord’s supper together… he closed the solemnity with this prayer, that God would preserve the good impressions of the ordinance upon them.” The Supper and the prayer were one event in two movements: the body and blood given at the table, and then the intercession that specified what the giving was for. They belong together. The meal is what the prayer explains.

There is one more thing to note before entering the prayer itself. The Letter to the Hebrews says Christ “ever liveth to make intercession for them” (Hebrews 7:25). The prayer of John 17 is not a historical artifact. It is the articulate form of what the ascended Christ does continuously before the Father. When you read John 17, you are not reading something that happened once and ended. You are reading the posture of your High Priest: now, today, at this moment. The prayer is still in the air.

This Is Life Eternal

Jesus opens the prayer with a request: “Father, the hour is come; glorify thy Son, that thy Son also may glorify thee” (John 17:1). He is not asking to be spared. He is asking that what is about to happen will accomplish its purpose: that the death will be the death it is meant to be, producing the glory it is meant to produce.

Then, in verse 3, he defines the thing the prayer is ultimately about.

John 17:3 (KJV)

And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.

Stop here. This verse is worth the price of admission on its own, because what Jesus does in it is definitional. He is not describing how to get eternal life. He is not listing the conditions for entering heaven. He is answering the question: what is it? What is the thing, the ultimate thing, that his death is meant to purchase?

And his answer is a relationship.

The Greek word translated “know” is ginōskō. The distinction is not always airtight in New Testament Greek (the words overlap more than introductory grammars suggest), but the general pattern holds: ginōskō is the knowing that emerges from encounter, presence, time together. It is the word used when Moses knew God “face to face” (Exodus 33:11 in the Septuagint). It is the word underneath Jeremiah’s new covenant promise: “they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest” (Jeremiah 31:34). When Adam “knew” Eve and she conceived: that is the same word. It is the most personal knowing there is.

This is the definition Jesus gives for eternal life. Not duration. Not a destination. Not a location that requires a death to reach. He defines eternal life as knowing the Father through the Son.

Matthew Henry saw this clearly and would not let readers move past it easily: “To know God and Jesus Christ is eternal life; not barely to know them, but spiritually and savingly to know them… a knowledge that is productive of love, and reverence, and holy obedience. This knowledge of God and Christ is itself the beginning of eternal life. Heaven is the perfection of this knowledge.”

The beginning. The perfection. The thing is not somewhere else. It is the knowing — and the knowing is available now, to anyone who receives it. Heaven is not where eternal life is deposited for later retrieval. Heaven is where the ginōskō of John 17:3 reaches its completion. It begins here.

Every theology that has told people salvation is primarily about going to heaven when you die has read past this verse without stopping at it. That is not a small error. If eternal life is knowing God, then the question is not “will I get there?” but “do I know him?” The knowing, by Jesus’s own definition, is the thing itself.

That knowing is not independent of what the rest of the prayer describes. It is the mode in which the distributed glory of verse 22 is received. The eternal life of verse 3 and the glory given in verse 22 are not two separate gifts. They are the same gift seen from different angles. The ginōskō is what it feels like, from inside, to receive the doxa.

Not Removal. Sending.

In the middle section of the prayer (John 17:6–19), Jesus prays for the eleven men in the room. He has manifested the Father’s name to them. He has kept them through everything. Now he is leaving, and he is asking the Father to keep them in his absence.

John 17:15-18 (KJV)

I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil… As thou hast sent me into the world, even so have I also sent them into the world.

He could have prayed for their removal. He did not. He explicitly prayed against it.

The theological instinct that runs throughout certain forms of Christianity is the hope for extraction: the sense that holiness means separation from the world’s contamination, that the truly faithful will be taken away from the mess before things get worse. This instinct takes many forms: the monastery built away from the city, the community compound, the expectation of a rapture that removes believers before the world’s final catastrophe. The shape underneath all of them is the same. God will remove us.

Some of that instinct comes from a genuine and honorable desire for holiness, a seriousness about the ways the world corrodes. That instinct is not wrong in its concern. But the solution it reaches for is not the one Jesus prayed for. His prayer was not remove them from the corrosion. It was keep them in the middle of it. The distinction between protection and extraction is not a minor one. One assumes the world is a place where God works through his people. The other assumes the world is a place from which God’s people need to escape.

Jesus’s prayer on the night before his death runs in the former direction. He does not pray for the removal of his disciples. He prays for their protection within the world, and then he sends them further into it: “As thou hast sent me into the world, even so have I also sent them into the world.”

A careful reader will note what Jesus also says at 17:9: I pray not for the world, but for them which thou hast given me, for they are thine. The verse has sometimes been read as if it narrows the gospel’s scope, limiting Jesus’s love to an in-group. That is not what the clause does. The prayer is intercessory, and its focus is pastoral specificity: the particular flock the Father has entrusted to the Son. John elsewhere is crystal clear about the wider scope: God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son (John 3:16); if I be lifted up… I will draw all men unto me (John 12:32). The prayer in John 17 is the particular intercession for the particular flock, and that flock is open. The scope of the gospel’s invitation is not narrowed by the pastoral specificity of this prayer. It is the other way around: the prayer assumes a flock that is actively being gathered, one believer at a time, from every tribe and tongue.

The pattern is the descent pattern. The Father sent the Son into the world. The Son sends the disciples into the world. The Spirit will be sent to accompany them. The movement is not upward, out, and away from. It is downward, in, and through. The Incarnation set the template: God’s response to a broken world is not to withdraw from it but to enter it.

Then verse 19: “For their sakes I sanctify myself, that they also might be sanctified through the truth.”

The word is hagiazō. In the cultic context of the Old Testament, the word was used for objects dedicated to the sanctuary (vessels, garments, the altar itself), things withdrawn from common use and reserved for the sacred. The sanctified thing belonged to God in a formal and specific sense.

Jesus uses the verb for himself in verse 19, and then immediately for his disciples. “For their sakes I sanctify myself, that they also might be sanctified.” The form of the verb applied to the disciples is a perfect passive participle — something completed in the past with continuing effects in the present. The sanctification of the disciples rests on a completed act. What they live into across their days is already grounded in what Christ has done.

Calvin’s comment on this verse presses the point precisely: Christ’s self-consecration is the ground from which the sanctification of the people flows. He consecrates himself not for his own benefit (he needs no sanctification) but so that the act, and the holiness it purchases, may reach his people. The priest consecrates himself first; then he approaches on behalf of the people. The movement of holiness in this prayer is not upward effort. It is downward gift. Jesus is the source of their sanctification. They do not generate it; they receive it. And they receive it because he offered himself as the dedicated thing first.

The sanctification also has a direction. Consecration is not merely the disciples being set apart from the world. It is being set apart for the sending the next verse describes. The vessel is set apart for its function, not merely for its status. The consecration of verse 19 flows directly into the sending of verse 18 — not chronologically (the sending is mentioned first in the text), but structurally. Holiness, in Jesus’s prayer, is not a condition for leaving the world. It is what equips the disciples to be sent further into it.

This reverses an instinct that runs through much of popular Christian piety. The instinct is that holiness is about separation: to be sanctified is to be pulled away, withdrawn, made untouchable. Jesus uses the word in the opposite direction. The sanctified disciples are sent. The holy vessel is put to its use. The priestly consecration is not a retreat from the world; it is a qualification to be sent into it carrying what has been given. Holiness in the prayer is a commissioning, not a withdrawal.

The Glory Given

The final section of the prayer (John 17:20–24) extends beyond the eleven in the room.

“Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word” (v.20).

The prayer of John 17 is not a historical prayer for eleven men who are now long dead. It is explicitly and deliberately extended to every person who would ever come to faith through their testimony: through their word, and the words of those who heard their words, and the words of those who heard those words, across every generation. The prayer’s scope is the whole church, across all of time. Every Christian who is in the room with this text is explicitly named in it.

Henry’s observation on the parting nature of the prayer is worth pausing at: “It was a parting prayer. When we and our friends are parting, it is good to part with prayer. Christ was parting by death, and that parting should be sanctified and sweetened by prayer.” There is something pastorally careful about Jesus praying this within the disciples’ hearing. He could have prayed this privately, in the garden, alone, before his arrest. He chose to pray it in the upper room, with the eleven present, so they would carry into the dark hours of the arrest and crucifixion the knowledge that they had heard their own names in the intercession. The prayer was for them, and it was for us, and Jesus made sure the disciples knew both.

What Jesus prays for, then, for all of them, for all of us, is in verse 22.

John 17:22-23 (KJV)

And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one: I in them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one; and that the world may know that thou hast sent me, and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me.

This is the chapter’s center. Everything before it has been preparing for it. Everything after it flows from it.

The word is doxa. It is the cloud that led Israel through the wilderness. It is the fire that settled on Sinai. It is the glory that filled the tabernacle so completely that Moses could not enter (Exodus 40:35), and the glory that filled Solomon’s temple at its dedication, driving the priests out of the sanctuary because they could not stand in its presence (1 Kings 8:10-11). It is the doxa that Ezekiel watched, in grief and horror, departing from the temple: the visible departure of God’s presence as judgment (Ezekiel 10). This is not a metaphor for reputation or honor in the social sense. It is the visible, weighty, overwhelming presence of God himself.

And Jesus says: I have given it to them.

The past tense is significant: “The glory which thou gavest me I have given them.” This is not a promise of future gift. It is the description of something already accomplished. The High Priest has already distributed it.

A precision worth holding here. Jesus names two related but distinct doxa realities in this prayer. In 17:5 he asks the Father to glorify him with the glory which I had with thee before the world was: the pre-incarnate, eternal doxa of the Son. In 17:22 he speaks of the glory which thou gavest me I have given them: the communicated, participatory doxa that the Son, as Mediator, now distributes to those who are his. Calvin, Matthew Henry, and the mainstream Reformation commentary tradition distinguish the two registers. The eternal doxa of 17:5 is not collapsed into the communicated doxa of 17:22; the creature-being-brought-into-the-Trinity language of the rest of this chapter refers to the participatory gift, not to an ontological upgrade. The glory given is real; it is not a blurring of Creator and creature.

What was confined to the Holy of Holies, what required a high priest, once a year, in terror, with blood, in a space that could not be approached, has been given. To the disciples. To every future believer. To the assembled church on any given Sunday morning in any ordinary building in any city.

You were told the glory of God was reserved for priests and prophets, approached with fear, veiled from ordinary worshipers. The text says the glory has been distributed. It is in the hands of the one who received it from the Father, and the one who received it from the Father has given it to the ones the Father gave him.

Paul makes the same argument from a different angle in his first letter to the Corinthians: “What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you?” (1 Corinthians 6:19). The doxa that made Moses and the priests flee is the same doxa that Jesus says he has given to his people. The Shekinah that terrified, that killed Nadab and Abihu for approaching wrong, that struck Uzzah dead for touching the Ark in transit, has been distributed to the people of God as their common inheritance.

The shift from old covenant to new is not a shift from glory to no-glory. It is a shift from glory-in-one-place to glory-in-every-believer. The inner chamber has not been emptied. It has been opened. What lived behind the veil now lives in the people.

Sit with that for a moment, because it changes the vocabulary of spiritual life. If the doxa has been given (distributed, past tense, by the one who received it from the Father), then every vocabulary that treats the glory of God as something to be reached, attained, or earned is operating from an old-covenant grammar that the prayer has already made obsolete. The high priest under the Sinai covenant approached the doxa on behalf of a people who could not approach it themselves. The High Priest of the new covenant did not merely approach the doxa on behalf of the people. He gave it to them. He brought it out of the chamber. He opened the veil, and behind it was not merely access. There was distribution.

The implication runs through every corner of what the church has understood itself to be. If the glory lives in the gathered people, then the gathered people are not waiting for a closer encounter to become available. The closer encounter has already been given. What is being offered in the rest of the Christian life is not a gradual approach to a doxa kept at a distance, but a deepening recognition of what is already at hand.

Chrysostom, in his homilies on John, paused at this section of the prayer to note the scale of what is being claimed. The disciples are not being given a portion of something lesser. They are being brought into the interior of the Trinitarian relationship itself. The glory that circulates between Father and Son is opened to include them. This is not adoption as a legal fiction, a change of status on a ledger somewhere. It is an actual sharing in the life that exists between Father and Son, effected by the doxa given in verse 22.

The purpose of this distribution is unity: “that they may be one, even as we are one.” The unity Jesus prays for is not an organizational achievement. It is not the outcome of ecumenical negotiations or merged denominations or agreed theological statements. It is grounded in the Trinitarian unity into which the disciples have been brought. The Father and the Son are one. The disciples are brought into that oneness, not as equals to it, not as a fourth member of the Trinity, but as recipients carried inside it. The doxa that moves between Father and Son has been opened to include them.

And then verse 23 reaches for the word teleioō. “That they may be made perfect (teteleiōmenoi) in one.” The verb derives from telos, meaning end, goal, completion: the appointed destination of a thing. Teleioō means to bring something to its telos. The word appears at Christ’s death: “It is finished” (tetelestai, the same root). The unity of believers, in Jesus’s prayer, is not primarily a project the disciples must accomplish through cooperative effort. It is the completion Christ accomplishes: in them, through them, by the glory he has given. The disciples participate in it the way the grain participates in the harvest: not by manufacturing the consecration but by being included in what the priest has already done. What the disciples are asked to do is receive, inhabit, and not disrupt what has been given.

Any system that manages access to God through institutional hierarchy has not reckoned with John 17:22. The veil was torn at the crucifixion (Matthew 27:51). The High Priest had already specified, in prayer, that the glory would be given away. The gatekeeper role, the ministry that positions itself between the believer and direct access to God, is operating under a demolished architecture.

Where the Prayer Lands

The eschatological endpoint of the prayer is verse 24: “Father, I will that they also, whom thou hast given me, be with me where I am; that they may behold my glory, which thou hast given me: for thou lovedst me before the foundation of the world.”

This is the trajectory. Not souls escaping the physical world for a disembodied ethereal existence. Not a gnostic flight from matter. But the people with the Son, beholding the glory he had with the Father before the world was made: the pre-creation glory, the eternal Trinitarian weight of mutual love and presence.

The prayer starts in eternity: “glorify thou me with the glory which I had with thee before the world was” (v.5). And it ends in eternity: “that they may behold my glory, which thou hast given me: for thou lovedst me before the foundation of the world” (v.24). The whole arc of the prayer (the defining of eternal life, the refusal of extraction, the sanctification, the distribution of the doxa, the unity grounded in Trinitarian oneness) is bracketed by eternity before and eternity ahead.

And in the middle of it: eleven men in a room, and all of us through their word.

The prayer encompasses us. It named us before we knew we existed. Every person who has ever come to faith through someone else’s testimony (through a letter, a sermon, a conversation, a book read alone, a word spoken at the right moment by someone who did not know what they were doing) is included in verse 20. The High Priest said so himself, on the night before his death, in the most remarkable prayer the Gospels record.

Henry’s summary of verse 24 is as clean as anything written on this text: “Christ’s desire and prayer for all believers is that they may be with him where he is; he has prepared a place for them, and he desires to have them near him. And they shall behold his glory: not only hear of it, but see it.” To behold: not merely to know about, not merely to believe, but to see. The ginōskō of verse 3 reaching its completion in the beholding of verse 24. The knowing that begins here ends there.

What This Means Now

You have heard eternal life described in terms of duration. How long it lasts. Where you go after you die. Whether you qualify to enter. These are real questions, but they are not Jesus’s definition. His definition is in John 17:3: this is life eternal, that they might know thee. The knowing is the thing. The relationship is the substance. The duration and the destination are where that relationship arrives at its fullness. But the thing itself starts here, in the knowing.

If you are a person who has spent your spiritual life trying to get to a place, it may be worth pausing to ask whether you have been chasing a location when what was offered was a person.

You have also, perhaps, heard that the faithful are destined to be removed from a world that is beyond redemption. Jesus did not pray this for his disciples. He prayed for their protection and their sending. The world is not a waiting room you endure before departure. It is the place you have been sent into, as the Son was sent, carrying the same doxa that was given to him. Not because you have earned it. Because he gave it.

The glory is not something you accumulate through a spiritual life well-lived. It is not a reward reserved for the advanced. Jesus said he gave it (past tense, accomplished). The same doxa that the high priest approached once a year in terror, with blood, behind a veil that kept Israel’s ordinary worshipers at a permanent remove: that is what lives in the gathered church, in the praying believer, in the ordinary body of an ordinary person who has received the faith through someone else’s word.

And the unity that results is not yours to manufacture. Teteleiōmenoi: it is to be brought to completion by the one who prays for it. What you are asked to do is receive what has been given and let it accomplish what it was sent to accomplish. The prayer is already in the air. The doxa has already been distributed.

You do not work your way into the Holy of Holies. You are told that you are it.

If you have been operating under the assumption that the life of faith is a long climb toward a God who remains at a distance, that the work is to get closer, to deserve more access, to finally arrive at something that currently seems far off, John 17:22 dismantles the premise. The climb was not required. The access was opened. The doxa was given. What remains is to recognize what has already arrived.

The Prayer Continues

The prayer of John 17 did not end when Jesus said “Amen” in the upper room. The ascended Christ is, at this moment, before the Father, as a living High Priest whose ongoing work includes this: praying for the people the Father has given him.

Hebrews 4:16 extends the consequence: “Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need.” The boldness is underwritten. It is not presumption. It is access granted by the intercession that preceded it: the prayer of the High Priest whose record before the Father is “he ever liveth.” The throne can be approached boldly because the one who made the approach possible is standing there still.

The prayer for your consecration is current. The prayer for your protection within the world (not your extraction from it) is current. The prayer that you would know the Father, that you would behold the Son’s glory, that you would be brought into the unity of Father and Son: that prayer is ongoing.

You are not someone the High Priest mentioned once and moved past. You are still in the prayer.

The glory is still being given. The consecration is still descending. The life that is eternal (the knowing, the relationship, the thing itself) is still available, in exactly the terms Jesus defined it, to anyone who receives it.

That is not a small thing to know.

The High Priest who prayed in the upper room on the night of his betrayal did not stop praying when he rose. The prayer moved from a hillside outside Jerusalem to the right hand of the Father, and it has been going on ever since. When the letter to the Hebrews says “he ever liveth to make intercession,” it is not describing a new activity that began at the ascension. It is describing the continuation of the activity that began in the upper room: the same prayer, in a new location, with the same beneficiaries and the same petitions.

You are in that prayer. Every person who has come to faith through the testimony of those who heard, and the testimony of those who heard them, and the testimony of those who heard them, is inside the scope Jesus named in verse 20. The doxa distributed then is being received now. The consecration grounded then is being lived now. The knowing begun then is deepening now. The prayer is ongoing because the High Priest is living, and he is living because the prayer was answered.

Thesis

On the night before his death, Jesus prayed as High Priest that the glory he had with the Father before the world was made would be given to the people the Father had given him — and the center of the prayer is the distribution of that glory, the doxa once restricted to the Holy of Holies, now opened to every believer through the priestly intercession that continues in the ascended Christ.

Key Passages

  • John 17:1-5 (primary)
  • John 17:3 (primary)
  • John 17:15-19 (supporting)
  • John 17:22-24 (primary)
  • Hebrews 7:25 (supporting)
  • Hebrews 4:16 (supporting)

Word Studies

  • ginosko (Greek) — to know through experience and relationship (G1097)
  • hagiazo (Greek) — to consecrate, set apart for holy purpose (G37)
  • doxa (Greek) — glory, weighty manifest presence (G1391)
  • teleioo (Greek) — to bring to completion, perfect (G5048)

Argument Structure

[Rubric section pending authoring.]

Historical and Patristic Context

[Rubric section pending authoring.]

Connection to Central Thesis

[Rubric section pending authoring.]

Contemporary Application

[Rubric section pending authoring.]

Cross-Chapter Connections

See also